Why Police Interrogation During Criminal Investigation...

How to Handle and Survive Police Interrogation Police interrogation is an investigative method used to extract information or confession by a police officer from a suspect or a guilty party. The goal of interrogation includes identifying and eliminating the guilty parties and obtaining facts on a particular crime. During this process, an person needs to protects and know his rights to allow the police officer to uphold the best practice. The following are reasons that outline why police undertake interrogation during criminal investigation process: Objective of police interrogation 1. Extracting confession-This is a difficult task to carry out since people who are guilty always never admit their fault. Crime confession is possible when a guilty person needs shorter sentence or desire to get off the problem from their life. Extracting confession works very well when a crime investigator possesses prior knowledge about crime. This is the core of interrogation which is incomparable with interview. 2. Identifying guilty parties-Identifying a guilty party while investigating a crime is a difficult venture in comparison with obtaining general information and eliminating an innocent party. This goal works well in a situation where many parties are suspects in a crime. It enables to find out other crime accomplices during interrogation; apart from main crime perpetrator. This allows the crime investigator to find the guilty party. 3. Eliminating innocentShow MoreRelatedThe Use Of Brutality And Persuasion1626 Words   |  7 Pagesinterviews by Police. In this case analysis it will discuss the purpose of interrogatory deception when conducting interviews, ways in which it is used, some of the current debates over the practice, and examples of theories to explain corruption and brutality. The number one priority that should be thought about prior to any form of interrogation Interviewing is the suspect’s rights and privacy are to be respected. However in some cases police have failed in investigation and interrogation and in rareRead MoreConfessions By Saul M. Kassin1471 Words   |  6 PagesFalse Confessions by Saul M. Kassin Within the criminal forensic field, there has been a shift in research dealing with DNA exoneration and placing guilt of a crime on the legitimate perpetrator. This scholarly article outlines the implications of DNA exoneration and false confessions, specifically the methods that are used to coerce an individual into confessing falsely. The risk factors for a false confession that are discussed include; interrogation technique such as lengthy sessions, presentationsRead MoreWhy People Falsely Confess And Crimes1638 Words   |  7 PagesThere are several reasons to why people falsely confess to crimes. This will include different analysis from studies carried out by criminal psychologist in order to understand why certain people are prone to falsely confessing to crimes. There are different characteristics to understanding why people confess falsely confess to crimes such as; individual differences, personal and situational factors, and Ethnicity. This essay also aims to identify what leads certain individuals to confess to crimesRead MoreThere are several reasons to why people falsely confess to crimes. This will include different1500 Words   |  6 PagesThere are several reasons to why people falsely confess to crimes. This will include different analysis from studies carried out by criminal psychologist in order to understand why certain people are prone to falsely confessing to crimes. There are different characteristics to understanding why people confess falsely confess to crimes such as; individual differences, personal and situational factors, and Ethnicity. This essay also aims to identify what leads certain individuals to confess to crimesRead MoreThe Rights Of The Supreme Court1290 Words   |  6 Pagesknown to Americans. But why are law enforcement officials mandated to repeat this to individuals they arrest? Where did it come from? In Miranda V. Arizona, a case taken all the way to the Supreme Court in 1966, it was decided that constitution al rights must be made clear to the defendant at time of arrest in order for any information received during interrogations to be used as evidence in court and to ensure the rights of the accused are protected throughout the entire process throughout the legalRead MoreThe Fifth Amendment And The United States Constitution Essay1163 Words   |  5 Pagesbe subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation.† The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution reads: â€Å"In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the stateRead MoreThe Crime Control Model1564 Words   |  7 Pages The crime control model and the due process model are two different, yet similar models that was identified by Herbert Pecker and that are used in the criminal justice process. However, how important are these models in the criminal justice process? And is it necessary for us to have both of these models which to an extent performs similar outcomes. To answer these questions this essay will explaining the meaning of these two models, in addition, it will be looking at the differences that thereRead MoreThe Case Of Miranda V. Arizona1695 Words   |  7 Pagescenturies, individuals that were apprehended by the police did not know that they had rights when being arrested. Past cases like Miranda v. Arizona helped shaped policies on the debates on basic human rights when being arrested. A polic e officer must have substantial reason to arrest you and read you your Miranda Rights. Specific actions, like traffic stops or a law enforcement official marching up to you and inquiring you questions are not defined as police custody. If you feel as though something youRead MoreFour Basic Components of the Fifth Amendment1382 Words   |  5 PagesAmendment include: double jeopardy, due process, the right to be heard by a jury and safeguards against self-incrimination. Double jeopardy is when the individual can only be tried for a crime once. In the event that they are acquitted and new information surfaces, they cannot be retried again for the same crime. Instead, new charges would have to be filed showing the individual violated another area of the law. (Sundahl, 2011) Due process is when all criminal suspects are guaranteed that they willRead MoreQuestions On The Law And Criminal Justice System1743 Words   |  7 Pages(What, 2015). Today these Miranda Rights are common knowledge, a staple in our Criminal Justice system that binds the rules and regulations together. From the arrest to either a conviction or acquittal, the Miranda Rights have been involved in all of it, but they affect whether or not one thing can happen; an interrogation. According to the dictionary an interrogation is â€Å"the action of asking questions or the process of being interrogated.† If the tactics are used properly and ethically, then a confession